It looks like there are some really happy folks today and some sad ones. The see-saw tilted back in the other direction as predicted. Meg's $141 million just wasn't enough. Imagine if she started the Meg Whitman Foundation instead with the $141 million? What a legacy that could have left. It's ironic that she probably lost due to the fact that her nanny was not a legal citizen. Fortunately, Fiorina only spent $6.5 million of her own money in her defeat.
Who would have thought that the witch would lose? Rand Paul proved that a Libertarian disguised as a Republican can get some votes. Reid squeaked one out. S. Carolina shocked us all by electing a female of Indian descent. That's a first time for both in that state.
I'll just repeat my comments from November 8, 2008. Just replace Democrats with Republicans.
"On the flip side, I say to my Democrat friends 'be careful what you wish for'. The Democrats have complete control over the near future. For that, they will be given complete credit for 100% of what happens."
Random Roving, November 8, 2008
Of course, no one has 100% control now. That's what will make the next two years so interesting. It will be "finger pointing madness". Can you hear it already, "if we controlled the House and Senate, then......" or "if we controlled the House and the Presidency then....." or "if you wouldn't have...., then......". The foundation is now laid for the chaos of 2012.
As the post-election hoopla and Sheeple grazing continues, the Federal Reserve today is making their decision on the next "cruise ship", the QE2. Stay tuned.
Showing posts with label meg whitman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label meg whitman. Show all posts
Wednesday, November 3, 2010
Under The Radar
Labels:
Democrats,
election,
Fiorina,
meg whitman,
QE,
QE2,
QEII,
Rand Paul,
Republicans,
South Carolina
Tuesday, November 2, 2010
Election Day Thoughts
This might be the most interesting election since 2008. It will be the most interesting mid-term election in some time. The mob will ascend on the voting booths in record numbers I think. I voted early last week to avoid the frenzy. As I stood in front of the voting machine I thought, "do I just vote Libertarian with one quick click or click it one by one?". I still claim to not belong to any party, but my presidential vote for Ron Paul in 2008 still looks like the best one. So I kept my direction consistent.
As I predicted for 2008, "change" will be the main theme. Not the "change" that political posters speak to, but change of the people in power. The mob is angrier than ever so they'll try to throw out as many incumbents as possible. The Tea Party is still just a light version of what is to come. It's almost comical at this stage. The funny part is that the Republicans will "pound their chest" in victory only to be ousted the next time. It will be a viscious cycle for some time.
Doesn't the fact below indicate that something is seriously wrong with our system? $140 million?? Just think what some charities could do with $140 million?
"Republican Meg Whitman has spent more than $140 million so far on her campaign for California governor, nearly $40 million of it during the last three months, she reported Tuesday. The amount the billionaire former eBay chief executive has spent on advertising and political consultants, most of it from her personal fortune, stands in sharp contrast to Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown, who reported Tuesday that he has spent $10.7 million this year, nearly all of it since Labor Day."
Source: Huffington Post
"Incumbents beware."
Random Roving, January 1, 2010
As I predicted for 2008, "change" will be the main theme. Not the "change" that political posters speak to, but change of the people in power. The mob is angrier than ever so they'll try to throw out as many incumbents as possible. The Tea Party is still just a light version of what is to come. It's almost comical at this stage. The funny part is that the Republicans will "pound their chest" in victory only to be ousted the next time. It will be a viscious cycle for some time.
Doesn't the fact below indicate that something is seriously wrong with our system? $140 million?? Just think what some charities could do with $140 million?
"Republican Meg Whitman has spent more than $140 million so far on her campaign for California governor, nearly $40 million of it during the last three months, she reported Tuesday. The amount the billionaire former eBay chief executive has spent on advertising and political consultants, most of it from her personal fortune, stands in sharp contrast to Democratic gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown, who reported Tuesday that he has spent $10.7 million this year, nearly all of it since Labor Day."
Source: Huffington Post
"Incumbents beware."
Random Roving, January 1, 2010
Labels:
Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition,
election,
jerry brown,
libertarian,
meg whitman,
mid term,
politics,
republican,
tea party
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)